Tuesday, January 31, 2012

The Right Tool May Be in Your Head

46 and 2 Tool Head by Justin Roberts

In its younger days, social media was full of  conversations related to tools - tools for using social media, tools for managing social media, tools for measuring social media...

Tool Overload

New platforms and tools were coming out like water from a broken pipe and I imagine that a lot of people either threw their hands up in disgust and walked away or took the first recommendation they came across.

If you haven't taken time to sit down with yourself and think about the tools you're using and how you're using them, I recommend strongly that you do.

By now you have probably been using social media for a while. You are familiar with buzzwords like transparency, authenticity, and social media optimization. Now is a good time to ask yourself:
  • Have my social media goals changed since I started? At the beginning, you might have just wanted to try social media. After you got more comfortable with it, did you set new goals? If not, maybe it's time for that.
  • How are the platforms and tools helping me reach my goals? Can you look at the interactions you're having with your community and be able to quickly know which platforms or tools have helped you significantly or maybe not much at all? Do you know why - is it comfort level or return on your sweat equity or maybe something else?
  • How am I spending my social media time? Are you spending most of it on Facebook and ignoring Twitter? Are you giving social media the same amount of time as before or more or are you giving it less? If you're spending less time than before or more time than before, is it because you don't like the platform or tool? You could be avoiding social media platforms or tools because they don't fit the way you work or if you're forcing yourself to use them, you could be spending more time than you want to.
Review and Revise

Check your platforms and tools against your goals and ask yourself if you've got the right mix to achieve your goals? If not, you need to make some changes. This might involve trying a different platform, like Pinterest. Or it might involve finding the right tool for really making the most of your accounts, like Hootsuite. Or maybe now that you understand Twitter, it might be time to add timing tweets to the mix; finding out when your community is online, then setting up and scheduling tweets to post when they're more likely to see them.

Retreat! Retreat!

With everything you have to do, it's hard to try to keep up with changes. But, being able to craft a good strategy requires knowing what your options are. Once a year, many nonprofits have board retreats to cover where the NP has been and where it might go and how it might get there.

Social media is your NP's public face. It's worth it to take a day or two to review that face and decide how and when it might be displayed to its best. By doing that, you're using probably the best tool you have available.


Good Reading:

If you're on FB, you might want to take a look at this post by Beth Kanter on how applications coming into FB because of "open graph" may change things for your small nonprofit.

Treat: The Situation

Because even doing good can have its bad days, here's a great illustrated story about business as usual can look familiar even if its in another world.


Please leave a contribution in the comment box.



Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Re-Viewing and a Review

Image via Alfred Hitchcock Geek
One reason I have thought about ending this blog is because I didn't think I had anything in particular to add to the cacophony of advice and insight from people who have made giving advice and insight a profession (and do damn well at it).

My own insight has never seemed to me to be particularly... insightful. Maybe it's because I live in my head that I don't find anything there to be very remarkable. But I'm exploring the idea that I might be more insightful than I thought.

Recently, I've seen a few things about which I formed an opinion that I figured would be unastonishing, only to find out otherwise. I thought I would give examples here, but it comes off too much like hot air, so I won't.

So from now on, I'm going to try share ideas without pre-labeling them as pedestrian or unremarkable. I've always thought I should let the readers decide what's useful to them and what isn't and by tossing aside my own ideas, I've kind of done you a disservice. I've read tons of posts and articles that were about something that made me think of something else. So, even if my main idea isn't something that would work for you, it could give you a spark to something that would.

This is something I hope you'll do as well. Share your ideas, whatever they are. They may be old to you, but they'll be new to someone and, even if they aren't, maybe your process for uncovering them is. Personally, I'm always interested in someone else's process, that's why I always ask for a comment contribution. Tell me what you think and maybe we'll have a conversation.

About Title Creation

Today I read this post about creating captivating titles. This is advice I have read several times and many people swear by it. Tell you the truth, I won't follow this advice. Apparently it works, but to me titles like that sound like the pitches that sidewalk salesmen give and makes me growl in the back of my throat. As always, do as you please.


Review of Giving 2.0 

Giving 2.0: Transform Your Giving and Our WorldGiving 2.0: Transform Your Giving and Our World by Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen
My rating: 1 of 5 stars

Note: I received this book because my nonprofit blog is on Alltop.

I wanted to like it. I always want to like a book, but I couldn't like this one. It's a nonfiction book meant to inform fundraising in a connected/social media age. But the tone was too dry and lacked inspiration, though anecdotes about the history of giving Arrillaga-Andreessen's family were interesting. Often, though, the personal stories came off to me more as a resume-building exercise; a way of listing bona fides rather than providing any illumination or illustration.

Most distressing to me was the organization: dense text with list after list occasionally broken up by the Giving 2.0 logo which is meant to draw you to the website to learn more. I found going back and forth impeded my understanding because I then had to re-insert myself into the narrative. And the information on the website seemed loosely connected to what I was reading, rather than providing a more incisive explanation or expanding on the topic.

In the end, though I picked up the book often, I could not get myself to finish it - not when there are so many other books competing for my attention.

View all my reviews